Education is a universal right, but its implementation varies by context. In recent years, **care protocols for students** have become essential tools to ensure equity, particularly in public and private schools. These protocols address not only academic needs but also emotional and physical ones, adapting to realities such as cultural diversity, disabilities, or vulnerable situations. However, their application differs significantly between institutions, presenting both challenges and opportunities.
This article explores how these protocols work, what distinguishes them across educational systems, and why they are crucial for building safe and inclusive school environments.

Source: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/711850284828462182/
What Are Care Protocols and Why Are They Important?
Care protocols are structured guidelines that define how schools should respond to situations affecting student well-being. These include:
– Detecting learning difficulties.
– Providing psychological support for bullying.
– Adapting resources for students with disabilities.
– Intervening in family or socioeconomic crises.
According to a UNESCO report (2023), 60% of schools in Latin America lack standardized protocols, deepening educational gaps. In contrast, countries like Spain have advanced with legislation such as the *Organic Law on Education* (LOMLOE), which mandates personalized plans for students with special needs.
Source: https://www.mylanguageconnection.com/what-are-clinical-protocols-and-why-are-they-important/
Key Differences Between Public and Private Schools
1. Funding and Teacher Training
Private schools often have more resources to implement advanced **care protocols**. For example, private schools in Madrid typically employ multidisciplinary teams (psychologists, speech therapists, and social workers). Read more
Public schools, especially in rural areas, rely on state programs. In Mexico, the *La Escuela es Nuestra* program has allocated funds for teacher training in inclusion, but only 34% of teachers feel prepared to apply these protocols (INEE, 2022).
Source: https://www.ucas.com/ucas/teacher-training/finance-and-support-trainee-teachers
2. Focus on Inclusion
While private schools prioritize academic excellence, public schools often emphasize **social inclusion**. In Argentina, the *Protocol for Addressing School Violence* (Resolution 149/23) requires public institutions to address bullying through community mediation, a practice less common in private schools. Read more
Source: https://iscresearch.com/pioneering-a-culture-of-inclusion/
3. Access to Technology
The pandemic highlighted disparities. The World Bank (2021) found that 78% of students in Chilean private schools had access to digital platforms for emotional support, compared to 22% in public schools. Read more
Source: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/pandemic-highlights-disparities-high-speed-internet-service
Essential Components of an Effective Protocol
To ensure **care protocols** are effective, they must include:
1. Early Detection: Tools to identify academic or emotional needs.
2. Family Involvement: Engaging parents in strategy design.
3. Teacher Trainin: Professional development in diversity and crisis management.
4. Adaptable Resources: Braille materials, dyslexia software, etc.
Colombia’s PIAR Program is a standout example, personalizing learning for students with disabilities. A 2023 study by Universidad de los Andes found this protocol reduced school dropout rates by 18%.
Implementation Challenges
1. Lack of Funding
In Peru, 67% of public schools lack budgets to hire psychologists, limiting **care protocol** implementation (Peru’s Ministry of Education, 2023).
Source: https://ictnews.org/archive/remote-amazonian-villages-in-peru-lack-schools-teachers
2. Resistance to Change
Some private institutions prioritize reputation over transparency. In Chile, the *Nido de Águilas* school scandal (2022) revealed how bullying reports were hidden to avoid controversy.
3. Teacher Overload
In Spain, a single teacher typically manages 25 students, leaving little time for individualized care protocols (PISA Report, 2022).
Success Stories: When Protocols Make a Difference
1. Public Schools in Galicia, Spain
The EduInclusiva program integrates care protocols with a focus on gender and multiculturalism. Through workshops on LGBTQ+ identity and migrant support, absenteeism dropped by 12% in 2023. Read more
2. Montserrat School (Barcelona, Private)
This institution uses AI to detect student anxiety by analyzing writing patterns. Results feed into its mental health protocol, a model now referenced across Europe.
The Future of Care Protocols: Toward 360° Education
International organizations advocate for a holistic approach. UNESCO urges integrating **care protocols** with public policies, as seen in Uruguay’s *Plan Ceibal*, which combines technology and psychosocial support.
Neuroeducation is also reshaping protocols. U.S. schools like *Summit Public Schools* use cognitive data to tailor teaching methods a model with potential for Latin America.
Education as a Right, Not a Privilege. Care protocols are not a luxury but a necessity. While private schools must prioritize transparency, public institutions need sustainable funding. Cross-sector collaboration is key: businesses can contribute technology, and governments must enforce robust legal frameworks.
As Ángel Pérez, an education expert at the OEI, states: *“Without protocols, schools become spaces of survival, not learning.” *
References
INEE Mexico (2022). Study on Teacher Training. https:// www.inee.edu.mx/estudios-2022
World Bank (2021). Education and the Digital Divide in Chile. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/country/chile)
Peru’s Ministry of Education (2023). Budget for School Mental Health.https: //
OECD (2022). PISA Report: Teacher Working Conditions https: // www.oecd.org/pisa
This article not only analyzes **care protocols** critically but also invites reflection: ¿Are we doing enough to ensure every student, regardless of background, has the tools to thrive? The answer must be a collective effort.